One of the things I like best about Churches of Christ is our denominational leadership structure.
We don't have one.
Each church is autonomous (pretty much) and has the ability to make decisions within itself. We're not bound to denominational strictures or fiats. Within a fairly loose set of doctrines, the individual congregations are not governed by a larger denominational body, but by elderships within each individual church. Which is where the fun comes in.
Through the latter part of the 20th Century, elderships were viewed almost as a board of directors. They were appointed for life (typically chosen by the other elders) and had basically unquestioned power of the church and its direction. This is still pretty much the case in more of the traditional churches of Christ. The shift that was happening in more progressive churches was from a director to a shepherd. And I think this is a very, very helpful shift.
Instead of being viewed from "on high," the elders lowered themselves into a position of guidance and counseling, while still acting as leaders. And the leadership styles went from being opaque into more of a translucent. As opposed to just giving directives, elders talked about why decisions were being made.
This is a style that I think really functions well, especially in the 21st Century. People like me (whether of my mindset or generation) don't want opacity from our leaders, we want to know why decisions are being made and that they've been thought through. We also want our opinions to be considered and heard, whether or not they're adopted or not. I think we would love complete transparency from our leaders, but recognizing that that's not always a possibility, we'll settle for translucency. We want to be assured that we're being led by people who love Jesus and want to be like him in their leadership, and will guide people to be disciples. I feel like I'm at a church where we have that, even if I don't always agree on how to do that.
I know our elders at Otter Creek are pursuing that and I am grateful for their leadership. I hope they continue be as transparent as they can be, guiding the congregation to look more like Jesus, both on a corporate and individual member levels.
This entry was posted
on Friday, March 6, 2009
at Friday, March 06, 2009
and is filed under
Church of Christ
. You can follow any responses to this entry through the
comments feed
.
2 comments
At OC, we typically don't refer to them as elders per se. We try to refer to them as "shepherds," which I like.
March 7, 2009 at 12:36 AM
Post a Comment
Post-Restorationist Perspectives
Post-Conservative Theology in an American Restoration Movement Context
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Interesting Items From Other Sites
Contributors
Categories
- amateur missiology
- Attractional
- change
- Church of Christ
- contextualization
- creative
- doubt
- Emergent
- epistemology
- Error
- faith
- Gospel
- grace
- Jesus
- judgment
- Mission
- Missional
- Perspective
- philosophy
- Podcast
- pop culture
- pop evangelicalism
- Post-Restorationist
- postdenominationalism
- Postmodern
- Preaching
- Proclamation
- Restoration Plea
- Theology
- undenominationalism
- unity
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(54)
-
▼
March
(16)
- Competition and other selfish pursuits
- More than Morality
- the weight of the Uninspired...
- A "Dark" Perspective...
- Choosing to Err on the Side of Grace
- Inside the Restoration Studio
- Change Agents!
- Post-Restoration Sightings #1 (and thoughts on the...
- Validity of the Restoration Plea?
- Theology and Pop Culture...an experiment
- Translucent Church Leadership
- Living (Not Solving) the Mystery
- A New Episode!
- Old High School Pictures, Puberty, and a "Post Res...
- It's a condition more than a position
- Launching A New Blog
-
▼
March
(16)